Watching
my son doing his geography homework the other day I was struck by how
much time he was spending on selecting online images to accompany his
(minimal) written work.
This
activity is now a big part of modern education which I also know
because as a (thankfully former) secondary school teacher of History
and English I was continually struggling with students to focus on
the text they were developing or learning from and to consider the
pictorial aspect as secondary, or supportive.
Students as old as
twelve would regularly include a photo of say, Adolf Hitler, with the
caption, “Here is a photo of Adolf Hitler,” with no other
information about him, as if naming him was all that needed to be
said and the real task was to cut and paste an image of him. Some
older students would often just plagiarise whatever Wikipedia told
them was the truth.
But
why should I be surprised about all this? If you are reading this
article on a train or metro have a look around right now, or next
time. There will probably be more people scrolling through photos on
their phones than reading something (apart from chatting by text,
perhaps.)
The
popularity of social media has given rise to even more use of moving
or still pictures as communication. Instagram and YouTube, to name
just two, have meant that sharing visuals is easy, fun and almost
cost-free. Amateur photography has never been so straight-forward,
thanks to camera-phones and digital technology.
Children
are obviously some of the major users of their own photos as well as
those of their friends. One survey of more than 2,700 young British
people aged 13 to 25 found that almost one in six children sends
naked photos. Equally, this so-called “sexting” phenomenon in the
USA lead investigators from the National Center for Missing &
Exploited Children to find that of the more than 130 million images
containing child pornography examined since 2002, one in four were
initially posted by minors themselves.
It’s
natural for young people to have an interest in their bodies and
other’s bodies as well. I see no big problem there but an apparent
increase in obsession with body image can at least partly be
explained by the strong influence of ‘supermodels’ (recently
including male ones) and the visual appeal of “skin is in”
singers and groups, especially from hip-hop, rap and R&B.
The
power of the metrosexual male idol such as David Beckham or Ronaldo
has yet to be explored in the mainstream media but this increased
emphasis that male-grooming puts on the connection between the visual
and the physical is abundantly clear.
Our society simply values those
with “eye candy” appeal more than anything else and that is
because a glance takes a split second but conveys so much. It’s for
this basic reason that film stars have long been paid absurd amounts
of money compared to others in the creative industries including
virtually all painters, writers and non-commercial musicians.
Looking
is easy. Listening is often hit and miss.Reading needs more
concentration or patience.
[This
article was first published in Catalonia Today
magazine, April 2015.]