Excerpted from “The Reading Mind: A Cognitive Approach to Understanding How the Mind Reads” by Daniel T. Willingham...
Getting Kids to Read
I said at the outset that our goal is simply to get kids
reading—it’s reading, not positive attitudes toward reading that will
make for better lexical representations and broader background
knowledge. But then we saw that reading attitudes, reading self-image,
and frequency of reading are interconnected. So in fact, getting kids to
read will not only improve their reading, it will make them like
reading more. Getting children to like reading more in order to prompt
more reading is not our only option. We can reverse it—get them reading
more, and that will improve reading attitudes and reading self-concept.
Well then, how do we prompt a child with negative or indifferent
attitudes toward reading to pick up a book?
Rewards?
Adults are frequently confronted with children who don’t
want to do what we want them to do. A common solution is to use rewards
or punishments as short-term motivators. What if I told a fourth-grader,
“If you read a chapter of that book, you can have some ice cream”? The
child will likely take me up on the deal and it sounds like he’d have a
positive experience. And that’s what we said we’re aiming for, positive
reading experiences.
Rewards
do work, at least in the short term. If you find a reward that the
child cares about, he will read in order to get it. The problem is that
you don’t get the attitude boost we’ve predicted. In fact, the attitude
is often less positive because of the reward. The classic experiment on this phenomenon was conducted in a preschool. A
set of really attractive Magic Markers appeared during free play, and
the researchers confirmed that kids often chose the markers from among
many toys. Then the markers disappeared from the classroom. A few weeks
later, researchers took kids, one at a time, into a separate room. They
offered the child a fancy “good player” certificate if she would draw
with the markers. Other kids were given the opportunity to draw with the
markers but were not offered the certificate. A few weeks later, the
Magic Markers reappeared in the classroom. The kids who got the
certificate showed notably less interest in the Magic Markers than the
kids who didn’t get the certificate. The reward had backfired. It had
made kids like the markers less.
The interpretation of the study rests on how kids think
about their own behavior. The rewarded kids likely thought, “I drew with
the markers because I was offered a reward to do so. Now here are the
markers, but no reward. So why would I draw with them?” There have been
many studies of rewards in academic contexts, and they often backfire in
this way."
Read more from source here.
No comments:
Post a Comment